<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Does Google Really Know About Webmasters?</title>
	<link>http://www.blogryan.com/what-does-google-really-know-about-webmasters/</link>
	<description>We're the Ryan's and here are some random thoughts from the two of us.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Blog Ryan &#187; Google Searching CSS Files</title>
		<link>http://www.blogryan.com/what-does-google-really-know-about-webmasters/#comment-10</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogryan.com/what-does-google-really-know-about-webmasters/#comment-10</guid>
					<description>[...] Seems the topic of the day is Google searching css files.  The theories range from whether Google is searching for hidden text, or whether they are using the files to filter content from navigation.  The fact of the matter is, Google is getting more and more sophisticated in determining exactly what a site is about and making things more difficult for the black hats.  That doesn&#8217;t mean the black hats won&#8217;t find a way around the things that Google is doing, it just means only the best black hats will survive.  I just hope that Google is taking a cautious approach on how they use the css files.  Many designers use css to position the text of their images either off the page or make it invisible so that the text can appear exactly as they had intended.  I&#8217;m hoping that if the purpose is to detect hidden links or text that Google doesn&#8217;t have the dial turned up too high.  There are many legitimate reasons to render text invisible or off-page that is not meant to deceive the user OR the crawlers.  Add This Blog Post to Other Sites:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Seems the topic of the day is Google searching css files.  The theories range from whether Google is searching for hidden text, or whether they are using the files to filter content from navigation.  The fact of the matter is, Google is getting more and more sophisticated in determining exactly what a site is about and making things more difficult for the black hats.  That doesn&#8217;t mean the black hats won&#8217;t find a way around the things that Google is doing, it just means only the best black hats will survive.  I just hope that Google is taking a cautious approach on how they use the css files.  Many designers use css to position the text of their images either off the page or make it invisible so that the text can appear exactly as they had intended.  I&#8217;m hoping that if the purpose is to detect hidden links or text that Google doesn&#8217;t have the dial turned up too high.  There are many legitimate reasons to render text invisible or off-page that is not meant to deceive the user OR the crawlers.  Add This Blog Post to Other Sites:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Blog Ryan &#187; Google Apps: Now you can register Domains with Google.</title>
		<link>http://www.blogryan.com/what-does-google-really-know-about-webmasters/#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 22:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blogryan.com/what-does-google-really-know-about-webmasters/#comment-6</guid>
					<description>[...] I&#8217;m not sure this is a good thing. With all they know about webmasters, are you about to give them one more opportunity to see which sites you own? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;m not sure this is a good thing. With all they know about webmasters, are you about to give them one more opportunity to see which sites you own? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
